It can be difficult to
have a lovely country or at one that looks “decent” without having the tax
element, don’t you think so? Taxes are what keep the country’s presentation to
the world looking fine. If the people wish to have a wealthy country then it is
not only the job of the government to do its job by helping the people out but
also the people’s job to pay taxes so that the government may help them out. Taxes
are a duty all Americans have to the nation if we expect to see the evidence of
a great and prosperous economy. A conflict the nation has nonetheless faced is
who and when should taxes be higher or lower. On the issue of taxes on
investments, President Obama believes taxes should be higher while Mitt Romney
believes they should be cut.
Romney would agree with
the quote “Paying taxes should be framed as a glorious civic duty worthy of
gratitude - not a punishment for making money” by Alain de Botton. Not only
does Romney believe that the wealthy should not pay higher taxes he also
believes that if the rich has more money in their hands they’ll create jobs
which will eventually lead to more money for the economy.
In an article from CNN
by William Gale, “Romney starts to fill in blanks on his tax plan” Mr. Gale
sated “During the summer, two colleagues and I showed that if Romney did not
want to add new taxes on savings and investments -- and raising savings and
investments is the second of four main planks in Romney's overall economic
package -- he could not finance his tax cuts without generating a net tax cut
for households with income above $200,000.” Although Romney’s intentions would be
to help encourage the rich to make more investments by cutting taxes on investments,
it is difficult to say that it would work out to make enough money to help
improve the country’s economy
In an article by Jeanne
Sahadi “The facts behind Romney's $5 trillion tax plan” she stated “Romney
wants to cut everyone's income tax rates by 20%, slash the corporate tax rate
even more, repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax and make investments tax-free for
those making less than $100,000 ($200,000 if married).” Romney simply wants it
easier for the rich to make more investments so that there could be more money
coming into the economy however a issue that arises with his proposal is that
those who do not meet the standards of making $100,000 or $200,000 if married get
taxed which in the eyes of some may seem unfair. The rich will continue to get
rich as some may say.
Obama’s view on taxes
on investments is very different to Romney’s. Obama would agree with the quote
“The 400 of us pay a lower part of our income in taxes than our receptionists
do, or our cleaning ladies, for that matter. If you're in the luckiest 1 per
cent of humanity, you owe it to the rest of humanity to think about the other
99 per cent” by Warren Buffett. Obama has often stated that if the middle class
is doing good than the economy is doing great but if the middle class is not
doing well than neither is the economy. He says this because it is the middle
class citizens whom go out and put money into the economy more than the lower
and rich income citizens.
In the article “Obama-Romney
on taxes: How much should the rich pay?” also by Jeanne Sahadi,
it stated “…President Barack Obama wants high-income households to pay higher
tax rates on income and investments. His stated goals are to help reduce
deficits, to help the country make critical investments and to increase
fairness in the tax code.” Why does Obama believe this is the right thing to be
done? It is simply because he sees it as being more fair.
It has always been an
obligation by the people whether they like it or not to pay taxes because it is
what keeps our nation going on a stable if not very rich economy. As Benjamin
Franklin once stated “Certainty? In this world nothing is certain but death and
taxes.” He was indeed right but perhaps it is not only about just paying taxes,
it’s about taxing fairly as Obama may see it or it is in fact right to not tax
some for the benefit of the country as Romney may see it.
Sources:
Gale, William. "Romney Starts to Fill in Blanks on His Tax Plan." CNN. Cable News Network, 01 Jan. 1970. Web.
Sahadi, Jeanne. "The Facts behind Romney's $5 Trillion Tax Plan." CNNMoney. Cable News Network, 12 Oct. 2012. Web.
Sahadi, Jeanne. "Obama-Romney on Taxes: How Much Should the Rich Pay?" CNNMoney. Cable News Network, 06 Nov. 2012. Web.
Not taxing at all or tax rich people at the preferential rate, this is what conservatives have been pushing through for decades and they managed to put in the people's mind that it was normal to give tax breaks to the very rich so that they would be encouraged to invest more and thus help all the Americans in general.
ReplyDeleteIt just strikes me that even taking a current situation when the economy just refuses to operate, the gap between rich and poor is growing at the accelerating rate and people still don't get it that feeding the rich and helping them be more rich just doesn't work at the moment.
Even leaving aside the fact that this is not the only way to operate the economy and the history proved this in the past, this kind of approach of favoring wealthier people through taxatition encourages economic inequality and, consequently, inequality of representation (think of Congress lobbying the interests of the rich).
So what do people have left? The political equality? Do people really have the power to make changes anymore? Leaving the economic aspects on the side (again taking real historic facts that suggest that this theory is questionable), prefenrential taxation is not fair and undermines the foundation of this country. People should stop taking the conservatives' words for granted and start questioning. I have a lot to say about the facts and so on but I will stop right here.
Not only does the gap between the rich and the poor increases, the amount of people on public assistance is also increasing meaning that there are more people unemployed then employed and those who are employed their wages cannot support the living cost. Also, all the jobs that are available are only minimal wage jobs and these jobs are offered to people who are over-qualified and who've earned degrees making them lower their standards to work at jobs that don't even need a high school diploma.
DeleteAgain, the economy is being at its worse with the capital gains tax being at its lowest 15%. There is an option of equalizing the capital gains tax and ordinary income tax that would remove some tax burden from ordinary people and at the same time discourage tax sheltering (which is huge under the lower capital gains tax rate). President Reagan practiced this strategy. This idea is not really that unthinkable. It is real.
ReplyDelete